This suggestion by the ever-insightful @mooreporfavor (oh wait, that’s me…) got me thinking about this assertion, which is empirically testable, but which I made without actually knowing whether it was true. I decided to do a little research for the good of the order. You may have asked yourselves, “What cities in countries with major football leagues are of similar size to Sevilla, say, a population between 1 and 1.6m?”
And if you did, in fact, ask yourself that question, here’s what you would answer (to yourself) upon asking that question.
Largest metropolitan areas under 1.6m, by country, and their football clubs (SPI ranking in parens):
ITALY:
Bari, SSC Bari (473)
Palermo, Palermo (489)
FRANCE:
Toulouse, Toulouse (136)
Bordeaux, Girondons (216)
Lille, LOSC (57)
Nice, Nice (73)
Marseille, l’OM (73)
GERMANY:
Düsseldorf, Fortuna Dusseldorf and maybe Monchengladbach (372/44)
Nuremberg, Nurnberg FC (423)
Hannover, Hannover 96 (425)
Leipzig, Red Bull Leipzig (14)
Bremen, Werder Bremen (81)
ENGLAND:
Tyne and Wear metropolitan area, Newcastle/Sunderland (39/348)
Sheffield, Sheffield United/Sheffield Wednesday (109/327)
Portsmouth-Southampton, Portsmouth/Southampton (429/82)
Nottingham–Derby, Notts County/Nottingham Forest/Derby County (none/121/322)
SPAIN:
Valencia, Valencia/Levante (50/154)
Malaga, Malaga CF (482)
Sevilla, Sevilla FC and you know who (38/32)
I would absolutely LOVE if someone ran with this and did a different hypothesis test, namely, digging through the SPI from top to bottom and either B) seeing the average size of the seat of top 50/top 100 clubs, or B) how many top 50/top 100 clubs come from a city of less than 1.6m.
Both of these are actually more interesting analysis, but ones I didn’t want to take on because of the data needed to pull it off. Perhaps it’s already been done on the internet, but I didn’t stumble upon it while poking around the internet.
Conclusion: Since I didn’t actually define a hypothesis, I don’t know what this really means, per se, but I found it interesting, at a minimum. Largely it does seem like Sevilla is HUGELY overperforming as a middle-small metropolitan area, and in this limited sample seems to be the only city with TWO high-performing clubs, albeit with one of them more deservedly high-performing and the other wearing green. I’m sure if you broaden the sample to metropolitan areas under 1.6 m, you’d surely find some tiny city in England with two big clubs, but I didn’t want to keep digging deeper and deeper down the rabbit hole.
PS - Since I was pulling this together on the cheap (budget: $0 and 30 mins), I likely missed some clubs in these metropolitan areas, especially places like England where there are a million historic clubs with nonsensical names.
Methodological note: Defining metropolitan areas is notoriously tricky, and Germany really vexed me (someone else give 'er a try, there are far too many cluster-cities, making it a mess!). I did my best without any deep knowledge, and for anyone asking, I used metropolitan areas numbers, not cities, because city population numbers are notoriously whack (e.g. Barcelona is only 1.6m if you only look at the city itself) given the way municipal boundaries are drawn. I used data from the European Spatial Planning Observation Network and reasonably similar sources, but didn’t really want to over-think this. Hopefully the peer-reviewed journal Monchi’s Men Weekly will let this through their publication filters